It is my
contention that unless you understand the difference between man-made laws and universal
laws you will never ever be free in the sense that you will always be a prisoner of your
own mind. The sayings below are very appropriate:
no better slave than a slave who thinks he is
free' - unknown author.
to tell me that my delusion is not real" -
"You are a
slave Neo" - from the Movie, "The Matrix'
are unaware that the name they see on their bankcard
is not them but a legal entity that is called a "straw man". This legal creation has a direct bearing on
your quality of life and everyone - without exception -
is impacted by it.
We have a
tendency to think that the name on our Bank Cards is
us - nothing can be further from the truth. I will
go on to explain why this can never be so and why though this legal creation you have unwittingly given
away all your personal power and are putting
everything have worked for all your life at risk. It
is a fact that what you think you have, you can lose at a moments notice - that is unless
you claim it back.
But before you
think I am off my rocker or some conspiracy nut let me say that the generation who grew
up in the 1930s had a great distrust for Banks after they lost their savings. This will
give you an inkling as to how vulnerable they were and you are and how it can happen
As you will
see none of this is rocket science but just plain common sense. You will realize just how
clever the legal beagles are and why they have claimed the fictional domain as their
exclusive territory. Enjoy.
In its most
basic sense a 'straw man", your name in all capital letters represents a man but isn't a
man, much in the same way a corporation (read corpse) is a non living entity and has many
but not all of the attributes of a living man.
corporation and the straw man are creations of human
mind and as since they do not exist in nature - the world of substance - they can only be
It may be
instructive to look up the term "fiction of law' in
Black's legal dictionary.
Incidentally Black's Legal dictionary first
came into existence with the creation of the
United States and is revised every 20 years
since - giving every successive generation an
opportunity to register any objection to
changes in its words and their
this is the dictionary George Orwell is
referring to in his book 1984 where in the world
of doublethink every revision of the dictionary
has fewer and fewer words.
example the word anarchy before its meaning was
codified in its original meaning it had positive attributes, it meant freedom (an=not
arch=chief). Today it means chaos or disorder which has negative
find extremely interesting because of our recent understanding of chaos theory there
is an underlying organization or natural order to apparently random events. But I
'Fiction Of Law'
Black's Legal Dictionary 5th ed. p. 562
assumption or supposition of law that something
which is or may be false is true, or that a
state of facts exists which has never really
assumption for purposes of justice, of a fact
that does not or may not exist.
A rule of
law which assumes as true, and will not allow to
be disapproved, something is false, but it not
The use of the
straw man became a necessity in law to order to make a bridge between a living human
being and non-living entity.
In itself it
does not make any sense as to why this would even be necessary. I will prove to you using
common sense that it is not only necessary but there is no other way around
Why is a man
not a man - in the legal sense of the word?
I contend that
this legal definition of a man who is not a man is an inevitable necessity build-in to
who we are as creators. We can not avoid it even though it seems to be an inherent
contradiction defying common sense. Nevertheless it serves a purpose all the
Its like The
Oxymoron, 'Agreeing To Disagree' but Only because it makes sense to do so. Its a way of
getting by an impasse. The concept of the straw man is used to bypass legal issues as
well as ethical issues. The only question that concerns you is whether this is to your
benefit or not so you
can act accordingly.
I would like
to give you a simple example as to how the concept of a straw man can be useful in a
positive sense. How it has been legally applied unethically is a topic for another essay.
In this essay the intention is to establish a clear distinction of what is a 'legal
fiction' and what it is 'not' so that people come into awareness and have no
For example if
it was the understood by all in a tribal society that the eldest son would inherit all
the property upon the fathers's death - what would happen if they were no male
or legal work around would be for the family to adopt a specially made male figurine to
take the place of the male heir - that figurine is the concept of the 'Straw man" in
acts as a 'STAND-IN'.
the legal community, turns a blind eye so to speak, not recognizing that figurine is not
a living human being but technically (legally) the family has a male heir and their
property stays within the family. Everything is fair and equitable and all are happy and
the small children are none the wiser.
Today if we
are to know why the 'straw man' is used today in our society it helps to understand the
function of language and make a distinction between what is the natural world and the man
made world - the world of fiction.
merely SYMBOLS of Reality.
When I say a
'house ' do I mean - my house? - your house? - the
house on the hill? - the white house on the hill? -
or the dream house I imagine in my mind?
WORDS are a representation or
STAND-INS OF REALITY and
as such they are full of ambiguity and open to interpretation.
This is why words in the legal sense need to be defined as they are open to intrepretion. This
is our first clue as to why you can never be the name on your bank card.
universal laws and things that exist in the natural world are consistent - "A rose is a
rose is a rose." (Gertrude Stein). The laws of the universe apply to all and never ever
change. Laws in the man made world in constrast are discretionary, they do not apply to
all and are constantly changing. In regard to man made laws one can always ask the
question, "Does this apply to me or not?" in nature it never is a
vs MAN-MADE LAWs
Natural Laws are
UNIVERSAL - like gravity they apply equally to everybody and
are no exceptions.
Man made Laws are Not
universal as they are always EXCEPTIONS to the general
Rules are broken legally
- granting of special
privileges & exceptions and permissions:
- exclusivity of priveleges given to particular groups
100% Responsibility for
Everyone is 100%
responsible for the results of their actions.
The law favours
People as directors of
companies can legally divorce themselves
from responsibility through legal mechanisms such as corporations
Companies furthermonre can legally limit their liabilities.
Parties may be pardoned for
breaking the law.
One owns 100% of what one
You sow and you legally keep
100% of what you reap as the result of your own efforts are understood to
be yours. You have full rights to all the products of your labor and
One never owns 100% of one's
While you may reap some of
what you sow, you do not benefit from
100% of your efforts as there is typically a legal tax or levie in
CHANGE with new laws and new
exceptions to the rules as new conditions that arise have to be
addressed. Law is determined by the law makers to fit their agendas,
their interpretation of how things should be.
Such a narrow view point
is prone to corruption and understandably becomes self serving as history
has proven - not to condone or to excuse that behaviour but to realize
that if you are coming from a paridigm of scarcity and fear - it is in
our nature to take care of ones own interests first.
|Everything has its own
intrinsic qualities that never change - "A rose is a rose is a
rose." Gertrude Stein
Everything is never as it
appears or constantly changes with interpretation
Law is open to
to the notwithstanding concept that the author of the law reserves the right of
Anything in the fiction of
law can be anything else, that is be anything the author defines it to be
can be one thing one day and another thing the next.
Those who control the
rewriting of 'his story' only use it to justify an end.
|Ignorance of the law is No
Excuse. Everybody knows the law as it a byproduct of
their experience in the natural world where the principles are few and never
||Ignorance of the law is no
excuse. this is a carry over from common law or universal law from
which most codified law is derived.No one knows the
law, as the definitions and applications always change making it
virtually impossible to keep up with all changes in the law.
|You have ownership of
everything you create
||You have no ownership over
anything you create as everything you create is done in the name of
an artificial entity which you do not own.
The natural world is a
world of substance.
Real things are exchanged
for real things. They have value in themselves, A 100% gold coin is a
The legal world is one of
In the legal world something
legally is made to represent something else even though it isn't true in
the natural world. In some cases words have the opposite meaning of words
in the vernacular. The legal world is purely fictional and has no
relation to the Natural World.
Anything in the legal world
has no substance as the legal world only exists by its definitions. Paper
is made to become legal tender only because the State says it is so but
paper has no intrinsic value in itself as a gold coin would. As one old
gent said, "Don't believe what you see in the papers" - truer words could
never be said.
|What is morally right
||What is legally right
rules. Morality is not a issue. What is written down as true is
|A living man exists in the
Natural World, that is self evident. To think outside of the box is not to be
||A living man, as a living cat
does not exist in the man made (artificial) world of laws and
definitions. No matter how hard you may try a cat does not recognize
a legal box.
The only way a man can exist in the articial world is if he acts or identifies
himself with the fiction ( straw man)
|Universal laws override man
||Through lack of awareness we
unwittingly subjectgate ourselves contractually into the fictional
domain. (Give all the power away that we have in the natural
|Non judical law is more
judicial law. Non-judical law or actions can only be voided by the
|Man made laws can always be
voided by anyone.
|Judgement of Disputes is by
||Judgement of Disputes is by a
We are the
Product of Our Conditioning:
If you are
having some difficulty grasping this concept of the strawman and why it important I
really empathize with you. To separate fiction from reality is a difficult task as we
have been conditioned by our environment to view our man made fictional world in a way
that appears real. In the process we lose our perspective on reality as it exists in the
only world that is real - the natural world.
take the example of a cat who crosses the street in
the middle of a block. If he gets run over that is a consequence of laws in the natural
If I cross the
street in the middle of the block successly I could get charged for J-walking. If the cat
crosses successfully the law doesn't apply as it is an artificial creation that has no
application in the natural world. The cat as a creature of nature does not recognize the
artificial rules of man.
Not only do we
lose our perspective on the natural world as we attempt to operate our lives through
imaginary rules that are made up, we also become frustrated in our day to day activity
and in our lives because they simply do not work.
The reason is
simply because, they are incongruent with the universal laws in the natural world. In the
universe of cause and effect, or Karma if you will, the rules of man as with the cat hold
Let look at
the definition of "natural" in Blacks and you will realize that the natural world is the
direct opposite of the legal world. One is real and one is pure
Natural - Black's Law
Dictionary 6th Edition, pg. 712, defines 'Natural'
by man or by influences of civilization; wild; untutored, and is the opposite of the
word "artificial". The juristic meaning of this term does not differ from the
vernacular, except in the cases where it is used in opposition to the term "legal";
and then it means proceeding from or determined by physical causes or conditions, as
distinguished from positive enactments of law, or attributable to the nature of man
rather than the commands of law, or based upon moral rather than legal considerations
So you can see
all our laws are fictions!
TRIALS of 1945 to 1949 gave recognition to the fact
that there is a higher authority than the rules of man. We are not obligated to follow
the rules of man if it does agree with our belief system.
convention that resulted after the trails gave universal recognition by Nation States
that they would abide to certain intrinsic human rights. In other words the Nation States
that signed the agreement agreed that men as human beings have the intrinsic right to not
be bound or can never be bound by man made laws.
YOU ARE A
SLAVE NEO from "The
To put it
bluntly the government cannot legally own human beings according to their international
agreements that is, if they were a signatory. Slavery in those States today is considered
illegal but ownership of your stand-in is legal. That is significant - why?
This is because everything you
think you own is in the straw mans name!!!
So how is it
then you a natural man who like the Cat has no obligations to government are obligated to
pay things like taxes.
address that first understand that Government at least in the United States was
originally created as a republic that as an entity to serve the people. The people in
this sense are its masters. This is in accordance to the natural order of things whereby
government is intended to serve people. And as is clear in the Nuremburg Trials men from
first principles are not obligated to obey the rules of man.
Let me be clear, this does not suggest that you do not have to
pay taxes. If you legally obligated yourself to pay taxes even if you didn't realize that you
did - you legally have to pay taxes. That is of course assuming that the law legally applies to
completely voluntary, the government cannot tell you to do anything that is unless you
unwittingly legally obligated yourself. Lets explore that avenue a little because this is
where awareness kicks and where you really get to understand the significance of what
this legal stand-in called the straw man really means to you.
It is through
all the contracts you signed on government paper
that you made all your voluntary commitments. In signing legal documents you in effect admitted that you
are the legal stand-in for the human being that is
indicated on the paper.
obligated yourself to all the obligations the government attached to definitions of the terms used on
For example in
your haste to get a business permit, a marriage license, a drivers permit did you follow
up on the definitions of terms in the various statues that are associated with those
forms? When you signed your name on your signature card when you opened a bank account
did you check the details terms of the contract and their definitions?
RIGHTS - What Human Rights?
By the terms of the contracts mentioned in the preceding
paragraph you have just overwritten any human rights you may of had.
Yes you have
your human rights and they may even be recognized by your country through the Geneva
Convention but these still may not apply.
In Canada, the
Prime Minister of Canada Pierre Elliot Trudeau was responsible for establishing rights
for its citizens but was this recognizing the rights of a human being or was it the
rights of a government created fictional entity? If Canada was a signatory for the Genava
convention, why would this even be necessary?
Do you know
which applies? It is self evident that
government cannot give you rights that it does not has any
authority to give. Who is wagging who, the tail or the dog. The suggestion here is the State
can only grant privileges and rights to you only if it has
authority over you that is only if you have already given your authority to it via the straw
man. It then is at the descretion of the State to grant the 'Straw man' rights not withstanding
the fact that it can take it back at any time. If you were a Canadian adult at the time you
will recall that the province Quebec never did agree to the non-withstanding clause - now you
know one possible reason why.
to tell me that my delusion is not real" -
As you are a
human being the state has no authority over you. If
it asserts its authority over you it makes sense that you can legally appeal to the world court for justice
if your country was a signatory of the Geneva Convention
when the various States contractually agreed to respect our inherent human
Or you can
stand your ground and stand outside their state jurisdiction recognizing a higher authority or can you? Not if you
haven't divorced yourself from the strawman.
ALWAYS OVERULE GENERALIZATIONS.
constitution of a state may recognize certain things in its charter which defines its
purpose and limitations. But there is one thing in law that you should be aware of it and
that is specifics always over rule generalizations.
witness in court describes the thief as a woman with long black hair and the other as
a slender man with long black hair with a scar on his left check - the second more
detailed description will always overrule the first.
In this sense
your contracts with the State are specifics between you as an individual and not blanket
generalizations as is evident by a constitution or Bill of Rights. The specifics of the
contract override everything else.
here is: be fully aware of the implications of all the contracts you have unwittingly
become a party to.
If you really
want 100% ownership of everything you created in the name of the straw man you have to
take self responsibility and claim back what is rightfully yours. It is also in your best
interest to nullify all the contracts that are not in your best
In the realm
natural world man by his actions and non actions takes full responsibility for himself. In law what operates here is the
concept of neglect - that which you do not claim automatically reverts to the State as
you did not deem it important.
you fail to take action you are legally a ward of the state and they have every right to
do what they will with you. I write this not for my sake or your sake - we at this time
are relatively well off but I fear for the sake of our children and their childrens
children. Other parts of the world are not so fortunate.
The beauty of
a contract is that if you have the capacity of entering into a contract you have the
option of exiting out of a contract. For more info go to http://www.copyright-name.com Permission to
repost granted with full disclosure/credits.